Affiliation:
1. Department of Global Political Studies, Malmö University, Sweden
Abstract
This article proposes the analysis of synthetic personalization as a new approach in studying and understanding the legitimization of the Crimean annexation. Drawing upon Norman Fairclough, synthetic personalization is a discursive strategy that identifies how aspects of language, which are regarded as commonsensical and normal, have ideological power, as they can become manipulative and controlling. The application of synthetic personalization to the March 2014 address of Russian President Vladimir Putin draws the audience’s attention to traits that unify the masses and thus stimulate their individual features, in particular by relying on presuppositions. The article argues that the address legitimized the annexation of Crimea by framing the annexation as a result of a religious, military, and heterogeneous unity, which unified Crimea and Russia. The findings also question the impact of the one-sided production process and who is the actual producer of the address.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference52 articles.
1. National History Curriculum and Standards for Secondary Schools in the Russian Federation
2. BBC (2014a) Ukraine: Putin signs Crimea annexation, March 21. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26686949 (accessed 7 April 2022)
3. BBC (2014b) Crimea crisis: Russian President Putin’s speech annotated, 19 March. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26652058
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献