First pass effect vs multiple passes complete reperfusion: A retrospective study

Author:

Hassan Ameer E1,Dibas Mahmoud12ORCID,Sarraj Amrou3,Ghozy Sherief45ORCID,El-Qushayri Amr Ehab6,Dmytriw Adam A7ORCID,Tekle Wondwossen G1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Valley Baptist Medical Center – Harlingen, TX, USA

2. Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Neurology, University of Texas at Houston Stroke Center, Houston, TX, USA

4. Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

5. Neurosurgery Department, El Sheikh Zayed Specialized Hospital, Giza, Egypt

6. Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

7. Neuroradiology and Neurointervention Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Background and purpose First pass effect (FPE) is defined as achieving modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grade 2c/3 reperfusion from the first pass and is associated with more favorable outcomes. We aimed to compare FPE and non-FPE using a large database and further compare first-pass mTICI 2b with multiple passes mTICI 3. Methods A retrospective cohort study of acute ischemic stroke patients who received mechanical thrombectomy at a high-volume center was performed. Baseline characteristics and outcomes including rates of discharge and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤2), mortality, symptomatic, and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were compared. Results Of the 637 patients included, 294 achieved FPE; 161 patients had multiple passes mTICI 3 and 36 had first pass mTICI 2b. Propensity-score matching resulted in 211 matched pairs for FPE vs non-FPE, and 30 matched pairs for multiple passes mTICI 3 vs first pass mTICI 2b. The FPE group had significantly more instances of discharge (33.6% vs 19.4%, p = 0.001) and 90-day functional independence (51.7% vs 40.8%, p = 0.032), and lower rates of mortality (18.0% vs 27.5%, p = 0.027) compared to non-FPE. There was no significant difference between first pass mTICI 2b and multiple passes mTICI 3 concerning any studied outcomes. Conclusions First pass mTICI 2c/3 is safer and is associated with higher rates of functional independence. We did not observe a significant difference between first pass mTICI 2b and multiple passes mTICI 3. The limitations of this study prevent us from drawing conclusions related to the difference between them and calls for future large-scale studies to explore that further.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3