Barriers to Engagement in a Workplace Weight Management Program: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Clancy Shayna M.1,Stroo Marissa2,Schoenfisch Ashley3,Dabrera Thushani4,Østbye Truls25

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

2. Duke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

3. Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA

4. Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition, Colombo, Sri Lanka

5. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate (1) why some participants in a workplace weight management program were more engaged in the program, (2) specific barriers and facilitators for engagement and weight loss, and (3) suggest how workplaces may better engage employees in these programs to improve their effectiveness. Design: Qualitative study (8 focus groups). Setting: A large academic university and medical system. Participants: Twenty-six (5%) of the 550 employees who participated in a weight management program as part of the Steps to Health study. Measures: A trained moderator guided the audio-recorded focus groups. Analysis: Transcripts were analyzed using the directed content analysis approach. Results: Participants faced numerous barriers to engagement in workplace weight management programs, both within and outside the workplace. Participants viewed the coaches positively and reported that the coaches had a strong influence on their engagement in the program. Participants suggested increased frequency and variety of contact by coaches, on-site group exercise classes, and tailored educational materials. Conclusion: Workplace weight management programs may be improved by being more flexible around participants’ schedules and changing needs, by increasing access to affordable, convenient exercise facilities, and by implementing institutional changes that encourage healthy eating and physical activity during the workday. Employers should measure program engagement and solicit participant feedback to ensure that the programs are appropriate and delivered in an optimal manner.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3