Communications to Promote Interest and Confidence in COVID-19 Vaccines

Author:

Thorpe Alistair1ORCID,Fagerlin Angela12,Drews Frank A.23,Butler Jorie124,Stevens Vanessa12,Riddoch Marian S.1,Scherer Laura D.56

Affiliation:

1. University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

2. Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT

3. University of Utah College of Social and Behavioral Science, Salt Lake City, UT

4. Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

5. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

6. VA Denver Center for Innovation, Denver, CO

Abstract

Purpose Communicating about COVID-19 vaccine side effects and efficacy is crucial for promoting transparency and informed decision-making, but there is limited evidence on how to do so effectively. Design A within-subjects experiment. Setting Online survey from January 21 to February 6, 2021. Subjects 596 US Veterans and 447 non-Veterans. Intervention 5 messages about COVID-19 vaccine side effects and 4 messages about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Measures COVID-19 vaccine interest (1 = “I definitely do NOT want the vaccine” to 7 = “I definitely WANT the vaccine” with the midpoint 4 = “Unsure”). Confidence about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (1= “Not at all confident,” 2 = “Slightly confident,” 3 = “Somewhat confident,” 4 = “Moderately confident,” 5 = “Extremely confident”). Results Compared to providing information about side effects alone ( M = 5.62 [1.87]), messages with additional information on the benefits of vaccination (M = 5.77 [1.82], P < .001, dz = .25), reframing the likelihood of side effects (M = 5.74 [1.84], P < .001, dz = .23), and emphasizing that post-vaccine symptoms indicate the vaccine is working (M = 5.72 [1.84], P < .001, dz = .17) increased vaccine interest. Compared to a vaccine efficacy message containing verbal uncertainty and an efficacy range ( M = 3.97 [1.25]), messages conveying verbal certainty with an efficacy range ( M = 4.00 [1.24], P = .042, dz=.08), verbal uncertainty focused on the upper efficacy limit ( M = 4.03 [1.26], P < .001, dz = .13), and communicating the point estimate with certainty ( M = 4.02 [1.25], P < .001, dz = .11) increased confidence. Overall, Veteran respondents were more interested ( M Veterans = 5.87 [1.72] vs M NonVeterans = 5.45 [2.00], P < .001, d = .22) and confident ( M Veterans = 4.13 [1.19] vs M NonVeterans = 3.84 [1.32], P < .001, d = .23) about COVID-19 vaccines than non-Veterans. Conclusions These strategies can be implemented in large-scale communications (e.g., webpages, social media, and leaflets/posters) and can help guide healthcare professionals when discussing vaccinations in clinics to promote interest and confidence in COVID-19 vaccines.

Funder

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

American Heart Association Children’s Strategically Focused Research Network fellowship

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3