Mindfulness-based Interventions Across the Cancer Continuum in the United States: A Scoping Review

Author:

Emerson Brent1ORCID,Reddy Menaka2,Reiter Paul L.13,Shoben Abigail B.34,Klatt Maryanna5,Chakraborty Subhankar36,Katz Mira L.13

Affiliation:

1. Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

2. School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

3. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

4. Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

5. Center for Integrative Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

6. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Abstract

Objective To review mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) tested in randomized controlled trials (RCT) across the cancer continuum. Data Source Articles identified in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Embase. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Two independent reviewers screened articles for: (1) topic relevance; (2) RCT study design; (3) mindfulness activity; (4) text availability; (5) country (United States); and (6) mindfulness as the primary intervention component. Data Extraction Twenty-eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Data was extracted on the following variables: publication year, population, study arms, cancer site, stage of cancer continuum, participant demographic characteristics, mindfulness definition, mindfulness measures, mindfulness delivery, and behavioral theory. Data Synthesis We used descriptive statistics and preliminary content analysis to characterize the data and identify emerging themes. Results A definition of mindfulness was reported in 46% of studies and 43% measured mindfulness. Almost all MBIs were tested in survivorship (50%) or treatment (46%) stages of the cancer continuum. Breast cancer was the focus of 73% of cancer-site specific studies, and most participants were non-Hispanic white females. Conclusion The scoping review identified 5 themes: (1) inconsistency in defining mindfulness; (2) differences in measuring mindfulness; (3) underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities; (4) underrepresentation of males and cancer sites other than breast; and (5) the lack of behavioral theory in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the MBI.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3