Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs

Author:

Briscoe Forrest1ORCID,Ajunwa Ifeoma2,Bourgoin Angel3,Maxwell James3

Affiliation:

1. Smeal College of Business, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

2. University of North Carolina School of Law, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3. JSI Research & Training Institute, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Purpose Genetic wellness programs (GWPs) are a highly innovative workforce wellness product. Recently marketed to U.S. employers by at least 16 vendors, GWPs take advantage of low-cost DNA sequencing to detect genetic risk factors for an increasing array of diseases. The purpose of this research is to understand perceptions, concerns, and barriers related to GWPs, among employees from Black, White, and Asian backgrounds and different income levels. Approach Qualitative study with 3 focus groups (FGs). Setting Employees of large high-technology companies (deemed likely early GWP adopters). Respondents 21 individuals recruited online through User Interviews. Method FG guide developed via literature review and landscape analysis, and pre-tested. FGs led by a trained moderator and audio-recorded. Transcripts content analyzed for key themes. Results Nearly all respondents saw potential benefits to GWP participation for themselves or their families. However, there were profound differences in perceptions of risks to GWP participation between Black and White/Asian respondents. These differences surfaced in three broad areas: privacy and discrimination risks; family impact risks; and feelings about the employer. Willingness to participate in a GWP also varied between Black employee respondents and White and Asian employee respondents (including low-income White employees). Only 27% of Black employees would participate in GWP, compared to 90% of the other employees. Conclusion Most employees appear likely to support employer adoption of GWPs. However, Black employees report significant concerns regarding participation. Addressing these concerns through program design would benefit all employees, and could increase trust and uptake of GWPs.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

Reference32 articles.

1. Henry J. Kaiser family foundation. 2022. Employer Health Benefits Survey. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/report/2022-employer-health-benefits-survey/. Accessed 31 Oct 2022.

2. Health Benefits In 2021: Employer Programs Evolving In Response To The COVID-19 Pandemic

3. Commentary on the Study: “What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence From the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study”

4. Briscoe F, Ajunwa I, Sklarsky A, Tsai A, Anggoni S. Genetic wellness programs: business and industry overview. Report to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Grant #76663. 2022.

5. Genetic testing and employer‐sponsored wellness programs: An overview of current vendors, products, and practices

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3