Affiliation:
1. Boston University, MA, USA
2. Worcester State University, MA, USA
Abstract
Evidence-based practice initiatives pertaining to helping people recover from severe mental illnesses have designated certain practices as evidence-based (e.g., supported employment, intensive case management) due to their ability to generate positive outcomes in randomized trials. These practices are often described mostly in terms of their program structures, such as staffing or caseload size. However, evidence-based practice initiatives would benefit from deliberately integrating the factors in the helping process that can occur within each program, and which other mental health research has shown to foster change and growth (i.e., relationship variables, skill teaching strategies, hope-engendering techniques). This article overviews the research underlying those evidence-based helping processes that have often been overlooked in the study of evidence-based practices with respect to interventions for people with severe mental illnesses. Implications for policy and rehabilitation counseling are addressed to expand the evidence base to include evidence-based processes for rehabilitation counseling and research.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Applied Psychology,Rehabilitation
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献