Affiliation:
1. College of Communication and Information Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
2. Coaching & Consulting, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Abstract
This study explores the friendzone, or the lexicon surrounding the nexus between platonic and romantic relationships. The friendzone situates layperson and scholarly depictions of platonic and romantic relationships. Minimal scholarship explores this common vernacular from either perspective—those that communicate romantic attraction or those that react. Specifically, this study investigates how initiators (those who communicate interest) and respondents (those who react to declarations) participate in the communicative and relational process of friendzoning. Participants ( N = 787) completed open-ended questions about their friendzone experiences, communication from initiators, reaction of respondents, and changes to friendships. This study utilizes analytic induction to provide further conceptualization and delineation of the friendzone through identifying friendzoning types, initiator communication strategies, respondent reactions, and relationship changes. Findings allowed for: the conceptualizing of the friendzone, highlighting obstacles for navigating non-normative relationship scripts, and identifying risks involved with relationship change.
Reference66 articles.
1. Psychological status of the script concept.
2. Emerging Adulthood
3. Bakor K., Golde S., Nie N. (2007). Estimating survey fatigue in time use study. The Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, 1–59. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.571.2926&rep=rep1&type=pdf
4. Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation.