Patient Identification and Tumor Identification Management: Quality Program in a Cancer Multicentric Clinical Data Warehouse

Author:

Pallier Karine1,Prot Olivier2,Naldi Simone2,Silva Francisco2,Denis Thierry3,Giry Olivier3,Leobon Sophie4,Deluche Elise4,Tubiana-Mathieu Nicole1

Affiliation:

1. Centre de Coordination en Cancérologie de la Haute-Vienne - 3C87, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France

2. Univ. Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France

3. Département Exploitation Réseaux et Infrastructures - DSI, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France

4. Department of oncology, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France

Abstract

Background: The Regional Basis of Solid Tumor (RBST), a clinical data warehouse, centralizes information related to cancer patient care in 5 health establishments in 2 French departments. Purpose: To develop algorithms matching heterogeneous data to “real” patients and “real” tumors with respect to patient identification (PI) and tumor identification (TI). Methods: A graph database programed in java Neo4j was used to build the RBST with data from ~20 000 patients. The PI algorithm using the Levenshtein distance was based on the regulatory criteria identifying a patient. A TI algorithm was built on 6 characteristics: tumor location and laterality, date of diagnosis, histology, primary and metastatic status. Given the heterogeneous nature and semantics of the collected data, the creation of repositories (organ, synonym, and histology repositories) was required. The TI algorithm used the Dice coefficient to match tumors. Results: Patients matched if there was complete agreement of the given name, surname, sex, and date/month/year of birth. These parameters were assigned weights of 28%, 28%, 21%, and 23% (with 18% for year, 2.5% for month, and 2.5% for day), respectively. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 99.69% (95% confidence interval [CI] [98.89%, 99.96%]) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI [99.72%, 100%]). The TI algorithm used repositories, weights were assigned to the diagnosis date and associated organ (37.5% and 37.5%, respectively), laterality (16%) histology (5%), and metastatic status (4%). This algorithm had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI [62.68%, 78.25%]) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI [94.31%, 100%]). Conclusion: The RBST encompasses 2 quality controls: PI and TI. It facilitates the implementation of transversal structuring and assessments of the performance of the provided care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3