Abstract
Current adaptive social protection programs and policies have been predominately designed from the organizational level, applied via a top-down trajectory, and are passively accepted by affected communities. While bottom-up grassroots interventions, providing their benefits, have rarely been encouraged in adaptive social protection programs nor complimented the related adaptive social protection policies. Based on a case study of the post-Wenchuan earthquake reconstruction and recovery in rural areas, this research qualitatively examines the broader range of benefits of self-built undertakings that support government-oriented adaptive social protection initiatives. These self-efforts have accomplished much more than the original adaptive social protection initiatives could have achieved. They not only provide the residents with safe, comfortable, and healthy places to live but also protect their traditional knowledge and skills, improve family relationships, and promote community cohesion. Thus, fundamentally supporting disaster survivors to rebuild their lives and livelihood and strengthen their resilience capacity. Although the uniqueness of the community-based environment limits self-reconstruction, this study argues that the self-reconstruction approach, as a community-driven strategy, encourages communities to develop their instruments, advancing current official adaptive social protection agendas. The bottom-up community-customized interventions will better serve disaster survivors to protect, promote, and transfer affected residents’ livelihoods and social relations; reduce their various vulnerabilities; ultimately build their resilience capacity to achieve the global priority of climate change adaptation and disaster reduction.
Reference59 articles.
1. Adaptive Social Protection: Mapping the Evidence and Policy Context in the Agriculture Sector in South Asia
2. Arnold Catherine, Conway Tim, and Greenslade Matthew. 2011. Cash Transfers Literature Review. London, GBR: Department for International Development. Retrieved March 20, 2020 (https://www.calpnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/cash-transfers-literature-review.pdf).
3. Leaders, not clients: grassroots women's groups transforming social protection
4. Social protection is a grassroots reality: Making the case for policy reflections on community-based social protection actors and services in Africa
5. Barrientos Armando. 2010. “Social Protection and Poverty. Social Policy and Development Program.” Paper No. 42. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva, CHE. Retrieved March 22, 2020 (http://www.unrisd.org/publications/pp-barrientos).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献