Is the Dogmatism Scale Irreversible?

Author:

Ray J.J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

A review of various attempts to produce balanced versions of the Rokeach Dogmatism Scale (‘D’ scale) shows that the highest positive-negative correlation obtained on a general population sample was-0,32. This was obtained with the Ray (1974a) ‘BD’ Scale Mark 11. An attempt to improve on this figure was made by administering only the best eight items of this scale to a community sample of 87 Sydney people. The positive-negative correlation obtained was-0,37. It was pointed out that Rorer's (1965) work showed only that there was no such thing as a general tendency to acquiesce. It did not rule out acquiescence as a response to ambiquity (Peabody 1966). Balanced scales are therefore still necessary. It was concluded that the ‘D’ Scale may be inherently and unacceptably ambiguous.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Acquiescence and Dogmatism: Impact and relations across two different item formats;Personality and Individual Differences;2016-09

2. The Old-Fashioned Personality;Human Relations;1990-10

3. Alternatives to the F Scale in the Measurement of Authoritarianism: A Catalog;The Journal of Social Psychology;1984-02

4. Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias;The Journal of Social Psychology;1983-10

5. Authoritarianism or Acquiescence? South African Findings;The Journal of Social Psychology;1983-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3