Affiliation:
1. Independent, Edinburgh, UK
2. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
Abstract
The current version of the Declaration of Helsinki states that ‘the benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention(s) … ’. This wording implies that it is acceptable for patients to be assigned to receive an unproven new intervention and to be denied a best current proven intervention. We assert that patients being invited to participate in controlled trials cannot, ethically, be expected to forego proven beneficial forms of care. Patients being treated in controlled trials should not knowingly be disadvantaged compared with similar patients being treated in usual clinical care, where they have access to beneficial care. In this article, we have tried to separate for discussion ‘the withholding of effective care from trial participants’, ‘informed consent to treatment’, ‘blinding’ and ‘use of placebos’.
Reference25 articles.
1. Questioning the Methodologic Superiority of ‘Placebo’ Over ‘Active’ Controlled Trials
2. Senn SJ. Placebo misconceptions. Am J Bioethics 2009; 9: 53–54.
3. Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine Compared with Zidovudine and Didanosine in Patients with HIV-1 Infection
4. World Medical Association (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The World Medical Association, Inc. BP 63 01212 Ferney-Voltaire Cedex, France.
5. Howick J (personal communication). No placebos (in trials when we have something better), Please: a plea to return to the original Declaration of Helsinki.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. If in doubt, think patient;Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;2021-11