Giving and taking: ethical treatment assignment in controlled trials

Author:

Senn Stephen1,Chalmers Iain2

Affiliation:

1. Independent, Edinburgh, UK

2. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK

Abstract

The current version of the Declaration of Helsinki states that ‘the benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention(s) … ’. This wording implies that it is acceptable for patients to be assigned to receive an unproven new intervention and to be denied a best current proven intervention. We assert that patients being invited to participate in controlled trials cannot, ethically, be expected to forego proven beneficial forms of care. Patients being treated in controlled trials should not knowingly be disadvantaged compared with similar patients being treated in usual clinical care, where they have access to beneficial care. In this article, we have tried to separate for discussion ‘the withholding of effective care from trial participants’, ‘informed consent to treatment’, ‘blinding’ and ‘use of placebos’.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Questioning the Methodologic Superiority of ‘Placebo’ Over ‘Active’ Controlled Trials

2. Senn SJ. Placebo misconceptions. Am J Bioethics 2009; 9: 53–54.

3. Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine Compared with Zidovudine and Didanosine in Patients with HIV-1 Infection

4. World Medical Association (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The World Medical Association, Inc. BP 63 01212 Ferney-Voltaire Cedex, France.

5. Howick J (personal communication). No placebos (in trials when we have something better), Please: a plea to return to the original Declaration of Helsinki.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. If in doubt, think patient;Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;2021-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3