Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: national cross-sectional study in primary care

Author:

Millett Christopher1,Car Josip2,Eldred Darren3,Khunti Kamlesh4,Mainous Arch G5,Majeed Azeem6

Affiliation:

1. Specialist Trainee in Public Health,

2. Chadburn Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care Research,

3. Statistical Advisor, Catchon, The Barn, Farnham Road, Surrey GU10 5BB, UK;

4. Senior Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK;

5. Director of Research, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 295 Calhoun St, Charleston, SC 29425, USA

6. Professor of Primary Care, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK;

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between practice list size, deprivation and the quality of care of patients with diabetes. Design Population-based cross-sectional study using Quality and Outcomes Framework data. Setting England and Scotland. Participants 55 522 778 patients and 8970 general practices with 1 852 762 people with diabetes. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Seventeen process and surrogate outcome measures of diabetes care. Results The prevalence of diabetes was 3.3%. Prevalence differed with practice list size and deprivation: smaller and more deprived practices had a higher mean prevalence than larger and more affluent practices (3.8% versus 2.8%). Practices with large patient list sizes had the highest quality of care scores, even after stratifying for deprivation. However, with the exception of retinal screening, peripheral pulses and neuropathy testing, differences in achievement between small and large practices were modest (<5%). Small practices performed nearly as well as the largest practices in achievement of intermediate outcome targets for HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol (smallest versus largest practices: 57.4% versus 58.7%; 70.7% versus 70.7%; and 69.5% versus 72.7%, respectively). Deprivation had a negative effect on the achieved scores and this was more pronounced for smaller practices. Conclusion Our study provides some evidence of a volume-outcome association in the management of diabetes in primary care; this appears most pronounced in deprived areas.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3