Drug-Use Patterns among Black and Nonblack Community-Dwelling Elderly

Author:

Hanlon Joseph T.,Fillenbaum Gerda G.,Burchett Bruce,Wall William E.,Service Connie,Blazer Dan G.,George Linda K.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare drug-use patterns among black and nonblack community-dwelling elderly. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Five-county urban and rural region in Piedmont, NC. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified probability household sample of 4164 community residents aged 65 or older from the Piedmont Health Survey of the Elderly (65 percent women, 54 percent black, mean age 73.56 ± 6.74 y). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of medication use and mean drug use; therapeutic medication category use. RESULTS: Data were weighted to represent the population in this geographic area. Fewer blacks reported the use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and total medications than did nonblacks (66 vs. 76 percent and 88 vs. 92 percent, respectively; p<0.001). Compared with nonblacks, blacks reported using a lower mean number of prescription (2.02 vs. 2.35; p<0.001), OTC (1.12 vs. 1.42; p<0.001), and total (3.14 vs. 3.77; p<0.001) drugs. The therapeutic medication categories varied by race for prescription cardiovascular, analgesic, and central nervous system (CNS) drugs and OTC nutritional supplements. More nonblacks than blacks reported the use of analgesics (62.5 vs. 55.6 percent, respectively; p<0.001), CNS drugs (26.1 vs. 14.2 percent, respectively; p<0.001), nutritional supplements (27.5 vs. 16.9 percent, respectively; p<0.001), and gastrointestinal agents (29.0 vs. 23.5 percent, respectively; p<0.001). Blacks were more likely to report problems in managing their medications than were nonblacks (9.0 vs. 6.1 percent, respectively; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there are distinct racial differences in medication-use patterns among the elderly.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 109 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3