Sedatives, Analgesics, and Paralytics in the Icu

Author:

Watling Sharon M1,Dasta Joseph F2,Seidl Edward C3

Affiliation:

1. Medicine/Clinical Specialist–Critical Care Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Missouri; Pharmacy, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Columbia, MO

2. College of Pharmacy and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

3. Pharmacy/Clinical Specialist–Critical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital and School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

Objective To solicit practitioner-perceived opinions regarding current sedative/analgesic/paralytic practice including drug selection, admixture methods, and methods of assessing patient response to therapy via a survey tool; and to assess sedative/pain/paralytic drug use patterns including dosage, route, selection, and combination therapy by collecting actual drug administration data from multiple centers. Methods Respondents completed a survey and collected drug administration data for 5 consecutive days in the intensive care unit (ICU) in which they practiced. Participants One hundred thirty-eight members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy section and the Critical Care Practice Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy agreed to participate in the study. Results Fifty-one percent of the participants completed surveys, and 45% returned drug administration data collection forms. Patients received sedative/pain/paralytic therapy 62% of the 5 days studied. The most frequently received drugs were opiates, followed by benzodiazepines. Intermittent intravenous injection, oral/enteral, and continuous infusion methods were used in most patients. Combination therapy was used 25% of the time, with benzodiazepine/opiate combinations used most often (46%). Administration protocols were rarely used. Paralytic agents were occasionally administered without sedative/pain therapy. Conclusions Patients received these agents during the majority of their ICU stay. Multicenter drug use data suggested a preference for opiate and benzodiazepine therapy. Many centers used continuous infusion therapy despite minimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic information on ICU patients. Further studies are needed to standardize end points, as well as obtain both pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and stability data in ICU patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3