Impact of Removing the Race Coefficient in Renal Function Estimate Equations on Drug Dosage Recommendations

Author:

Miller Janine1ORCID,Knorr John P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background The appropriateness of including the race coefficient in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in Black patients is debated, and the impact on drug dosing is unknown. Objective This study explored the impact of removing the race coefficient on drug dosing in Black patients in comparison to conventional methods. Methods This was a retrospective study of hospitalized patients who self-identified as Black/African American and were prescribed an antimicrobial that includes renal dosage recommendations in the product labeling. The primary end point was the discordance between drug dosing recommendations derived by body surface area deindexed GFR estimated by the CKD-EPI equation (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology study) with and without race versus recommendations derived from Cockcroft-Gault (CG). Results A total of 210 Black patients were included. There was an 18% rate of discordance when GFR was estimated with the race coefficient (GFR w/Race) versus without the race coefficient (GFR w/out Race). GFR w/out Race had a higher level of agreement with dosing by creatinine clearance (CrCl; κ = 0.779) than GFR w/Race versus CrCl (κ = 0.651). GFR w/out Race had less within-patient difference than GFR w/Race in comparison to CrCl (mean difference: −6.3 vs −18.0 mL/min). Conclusions and Relevance This represents the first report to examine the removal of the race coefficient and its implication on drug dose discordance. GFR w/out Race had a higher level of agreement and less drug dose discordance than GFR w/Race, in comparison to CrCl estimates. If GFR equations are considered comparable to CrCl for the purposes of guiding drug dosing, GFR w/out Race should be considered.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3