Assessing the Accuracy of Drug Information Responses from Drug Information Centers

Author:

Beaird Sandra L.,Coley Rebecca M.R.,Blunt Jeffrey R.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of response to a request among a sample of drug information centers and to determine the association between accuracy of response and individual center characteristics. DESIGN: A randomized telephone investigation. SETTING: College of Pharmacy drug information center located in a 500-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine drug information centers randomly selected from 154 centers that had responded to a survey. INTERVENTION: Each center received a telephone request requiring identification of Videx (didanosine), at that time a Phase II investigational product. Each center correctly identifying Videx was presented a patient case and questioned concerning adverse effect management. A written protocol of conversation was followed. Center confidentiality was maintained during data analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association between correct information regarding Videx and individual drug information center characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-six evaluable responses were received. Videx was correctly identified by 16 centers (28.6 percent). Two centers (3.6 percent) made an incorrect identification and 38 centers (67.9 percent) could not make an identification. Of the 16 centers correctly identifying Videx, four successfully linked the product with described adverse effects, but none offered therapeutic management recommendations. Factors significantly associated with accurately identifying Videx included possession of a center policy and procedure manual (p=0.011) and on-line searching capability (p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: These results identify an inconsistency in accuracy of responses among drug information centers. Although standardized operating policies/procedures and on-line searching capability may contribute to increased accuracy, there is clearly a need for enhanced quality assurance efforts.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference30 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3