Placebo Response in Anxiety Disorders

Author:

Piercy Marlena A,Sramek John J,Kurtz Neil M,Cutler Neal R

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review literature on placebo response in anxiety, to discuss sources and levels of placebo response in various anxiety disorders, and to suggest methods to prevent high placebo response rates in clinical research trials. DATA SOURCE: Data from scientific literature were identified using a MEDLINE search, and were extracted and summarized for this review. STUDY SELECTION: Representative findings were selected from clinical and epidemiologic studies, review articles, letters to the editor, book chapters, and proceedings. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from English-language reports of studies on humans were included. Only the most representative conclusions drawn from review articles were used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Anxiety disorders in general are thought to be extremely susceptible to a variety of influences, including patient characteristics and environmental variables. Reported placebo response levels in clinical studies of anxiolytics for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder vary widely, with a tendency to be rather high, although studies in social phobia and obsessive-compulsive disorder appear to have consistently low placebo response rates. Comparisons of anxiety studies with studies of other indications, such as depression, show similar overall placebo response rates. To determine efficacy, drug response rates and placebo response rates must be clearly differentiated. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of the literature suggests that placebo response rates in studies of anxiolytics are influenced by a number of factors, including both endogenous and exogenous variables. High placebo response rates may mask true drug response rates and may result from poor study design or lack of procedural standardization. The use of certain design methods may help to prevent high placebo response rates in anxiolytic clinical trials.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3