Clinical Evaluation of a Finger Oscillometric Blood Pressure Device

Author:

Sesler Jefferson M.,Munroe Wendy P.,McKenney James M.

Abstract

An oscillometric blood pressure (BP) device designed for recording systemic BP from a finger was compared with a random-zero, mercury-column sphygmomanometer in 76 subjects recruited from the patient population and staff of a primary-care center. After both devices were placed on the left arm or finger of the left hand, three BP readings were obtained with each device in alternating fashion, thereby according random assignment. The mean for all measurements was 119.2/72.4 mm Hg for the finger device and 118.6/75.3 mm Hg for the random-zero sphygmomanometer, systolic readings were not different (p=0.53) but diastolic readings were different (p=0.001). There were considerable differences among the readings obtained with the two devices in individual patients: the mean differences ± tolerance limits for readings obtained with the finger device compared with the random-zero device were 0.6 ± 33.5 mm Hg for systolic and −2.9 ± 25.3 mm Hg for diastolic readings. There was also considerable variability in the readings obtained with the finger device; the minimum to maximum differences in 39 systolic (51 percent) and 26 diastolic readings (34 percent) were greater than 10 mm Hg with the finger device; 24 systolic (32 percent) and 11 diastolic readings (14 percent) differed by this amount with the random-zero device. The variability in measurements made with the finger device was significantly different from the random-zero device for diastolic pressures (p=0.0048) but not for systolic pressures (p=0.8729). Based on the experience obtained in this study, devices to measure BP from the finger cannot be recommended for routine use.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3