Abstract
This article questions the evidence for flexible specialisation and calls for a re-examination of the real conditions of industrial districts such as Third Italy and the notion of the flexible firm. Flexible specialisation is also challenged on its theoretical assumptions which are ahistorical in character and based on a false dichotomy between mass production versus craft paradigms.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献