Author:
Kliman Andrew,McGlone Ted
Abstract
Most criticisms of Marx's attempt to solve the transformation problem focus on his failure to separate value and price calculations. It is argued here that there is nothing wrong with Marx's approach once it is construed as an exercise in dialectics rather than some attempt to map mathematically values on to prices. Consequently, much of the debate over values and the transformation of values has been wrongly directed at matters of mathematical technique when the real issue concerns one of method.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,History
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Temporality and Stratification in the Transformation of Value into Price;World Review of Political Economy;2024
2. Karl Marx’s Das Kapital;Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought;2024
3. Marxist Interpretations of Marx’s Explanation of Money Price;Explorations in Marx’s Theory of Price—Why Marx Is Still Relevant for Understanding the Modern Economy;2023
4. Dissolving the value-price transformation Rubik's cube: A response to Steve Toms’ review of Accounting for Value;Accounting History;2021-10-05
5. Response to Moseley;Review of Radical Political Economics;2021-05-03