Affiliation:
1. The University of Manchester, UK
Abstract
There has been considerable discussion regarding the regulation of platform-mediated forms of work, yet less attention has been paid to the actual impact of regulations already enacted. In this brief analysis, I examine the cases of Spain and Chile, policy benchmarks in their respective regions. While Spain has introduced a presumption of employment, Chile’s legislation leaves this point open but implicitly encourages classifying workers as self-employed. Nevertheless, both countries have encountered significant complications in implementing these laws, stemming either from the narrow scope of the legislation or from corporate strategies aimed at circumventing it, leading to ever more fragmented and prolonged regulatory battles. Looking ahead, trade unions and workers’ organisations should engage more strategically in the regulatory conflict, considering the enforcement problems emerging and, more importantly, preventing regulation from concealing the radical potential of these movements against precarious work more generally.
Reference23 articles.
1. Legal Mobilisations, Trade Unions and Radical Social Change: A Case Study of the IWGB
2. Alcalde LG (2022) Los trabajadores de Glovo están un paso más cerca de conocer las entrañas del algoritmo de la empresa: por qué es importante. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.es/trabajadores-glovo-cerca-conocer-entranas-algoritmo-1121939
3. Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead
4. Aloisi A, Rainone S, Countouris N. (2024) Platform-work directive: The clock is ticking. Social Europe. Available at: https://www.socialeurope.eu/platform-work-directive-the-clock-is-ticking
5. Azócar-Simonet R, Leyton-García J (2022) Dispatch No.45 -Chile’s legislative solution for platform work: Does it fit the bill? Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal. Available at: https://cllpj.law.illinois.edu/content/dispatches/2022/Dispatch-No.45.pdf?v2