Outcomes Following Norwood Procedures: Analysis of a “Small Volume” Program

Abstract

Background Institutional survival following Norwood procedures is traditionally correlated with a center's surgical volume. Multiple single and multi-institutional studies conducted at large-volume centers have recently demonstrated improved survival following Norwood procedures. We report both short- and long-term outcomes at a single, small-volume institution and comment on factors potentially influencing outcomes at this institution. Methods All patients undergoing Norwood procedures from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2020, at our institution were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression risk factor analyses were performed in addition to first interstage risk factor scoring to compare observed versus expected survival. Results The cohort included 113 patients. Kaplan-Meier freedom from death or transplant was 88%, 80%, and 76% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Freedom from death following hospital discharge after Norwood procedures was 94%, 87%, and 83% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The presence of genetic syndromes was a significant risk factor for mortality. First interstage observed-to-expected mortality following discharge was 0.57 ( P = .04). Postoperative length of stay was comparable to that reported for the period 2015 to 2018 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Conclusions Survival outcomes at this single, small-volume institution were similar to those reported by large-volume centers and multi-institutional collaborative studies. These results may be related to structural and functional features that have been demonstrated to influence outcomes in other studies. These factors are achievable by small-volume programs with sufficient resource allocation.