Comparing Characteristics of High-Incidence Disability Groups

Author:

Sabornie Edward J.1,Evans Chan2,Cullinan Douglas3

Affiliation:

1. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

2. Augusta State University, Augusta, Georgia

3. North Carolina State University

Abstract

More than 2 decades ago, Hallahan and Kauffman and others suggested a cross-categorical approach to teaching students identified with high-incidence disabilities (i.e., emotional— behavioral disabilities, learning disabilities, and mild intellectual disabilities) because their behavioral and academic characteristics were seen to be more similar than different. Since that time, more than 150 articles and other works have discussed and compared the characteristics of students across these high-incidence disability categories. This descriptive review examined 34 studies comparing various characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities. The results indicate that students with emotional— behavioral disabilities, learning disabilities, and mild intellectual disabilities do not differ markedly in social adjustment, but do display considerably different cognitive and behavioral profiles. Implications for instruction and placement are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An examination of the feasibility and implementation fidelity of a multi-component treatment program for students with EBD;Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth;2023-02-15

2. Training to Strengthen Middle School Teacher Competence in Learning Children with Special Needs: Needs Analysis;Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022);2023

3. Establishing Construct Validity of a Measure of Adolescent Perceptions of College and Career Readiness;Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals;2022-03-07

4. Sufficiency of Teachers’ Access to Resources and Supports for Students With Disabilities;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2021-10-09

5. Natural rates of teacher praise in the classroom: A systematic review of observational studies;Psychology in the Schools;2021-10-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3