Common Professional Practices That Interfere with the Integrated Delivery of Related Services

Author:

Giangreco Michael F.1,Edelman Susan2,Dennis Ruth3

Affiliation:

1. Michael F. Giangreco is a visiting assistant professor, in the College of Education and Social Services, University of Vermont. All three authors are members of the Vermont Interdisciplinary Team for Intensive Special Education at the Center for Developmental Disabilities, the University Affiliated Program of Vermont.

2. Susan Edelman, in the College of Education and Social Services, University of Vermont. All three authors are members of the Vermont Interdisciplinary Team for Intensive Special Education at the Center for Developmental Disabilities, the University Affiliated Program of Vermont.

3. Ruth Dennis are lecturers, in the College of Education and Social Services, University of Vermont. All three authors are members of the Vermont Interdisciplinary Team for Intensive Special Education at the Center for Developmental Disabilities, the University Affiliated Program of Vermont. Address: Michael F. Giangreco, Center for Developmental Disabilities, University of Vermont, 499C Waterman Building, Burlington, VT 05405.

Abstract

This study provides descriptive data regarding the prevalence of seven professional practices believed to interfere with the integrated delivery of related services for students with handicapping conditions in public schools. Based on questionnaire responses from 585 educators, parents, and related service personnel (e.g., speech/language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists) from across the United States, these data highlight foundational issues that have an impact on the integrated delivery of related services that are necessary for some students to benefit from special education. Professional practices are presented that are believed to facilitate the integrated delivery of related services, as well as those believed to interfere with it. Results of the study document the prevalence of the interfering practices as reported by study participants, and also the extent to which parents and general education teachers report a lack of critical information about the provision of related services. Implications are discussed that pertain to personnel preparation, supervision of staff, advocacy, and collaborative teamwork.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3