Comprehension Breakdown with inductively Organized Text

Author:

Gold Joyce1,Fleisher Lisa S.2

Affiliation:

1. Joyce Gold is a reading teacher in the New York City public schools. She also runs a learning disabilities unit in a community-based mental health clinic and works as an adjunct instructor at New York University. She received her PhD from New York University. Her main interests are reading comprehension, diagnosis of reading problems, and learning disabilities.

2. Lisa S. Fleisher is an associate professor of educational psychology and director of the special education program at New York University. She received her PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana. Her major interests include reading, learning disabilities, and instructional programs for mildly handicapped students.

Abstract

Comprehension differences between inductively and deductively organized text were investigated. Main idea recall of average fourth-grade readers and disabled sixth-grade readers was contrasted on both inductively organized and deductively organized paragraphs. Half of each ability group was tested with a retell and half with a multiple-choice measure. The results indicate that inductively organized text presented problems for almost all the children tested. The error patterns or. the retell measure suggest that the average readers were approaching the text in a more systematic manner. These ability group differences were not indicated on the multiple-choice measure. Results are discussed in regard to the effect of organizational structure and type of comprehension measure on comprehension performance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Organization of Japanese Expository Passages;Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions;2015-10-09

2. Component Model-Based Remedial Treatment of Reading Disabilities;Neuropsychology and Cognition;1999

3. Instructional Materials for Diverse Learners;Remedial and Special Education;1994-11

4. Selecting Children's Literature for and About Students with Learning Differences;Intervention in School and Clinic;1992-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3