Affiliation:
1. Department of Educational Foundations and Special Services at Kent State University,
2. University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
Attitudes of 49 principals and 64 special education teachers regarding the inclusion of students with mild disabilities were investigated. Results of a discriminant analysis indicated that principals and special educators were separated into groups with 76% accuracy according to their responses to items drawn from the Regular Education Initiative Teacher Survey (Semmel, Abernathy, Butera, & Lesar, 1991). items measuring attitudes toward the efficacy of included placements with consultative services, the academic outcomes associated with included placements, and the protection of resources devoted to students with mild disabilities correlated most highly with the discriminant function. Findings are discussed in relation to their implications for the implementation of inclusion reforms and the educational opportunities of students with mild disabilities.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference41 articles.
1. The Meaning and Practice of Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities
2. Biklen, D.P. (1991). Social policy, social systems, and educational practice. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 387-390). Baltimore: Brookes.
3. Are Effective Schools Reforms Effective for All Students? The Implications of Joint Outcome Production for School Reform
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献