Affiliation:
1. University of Lille, France
Abstract
In the standard native tradition of Albanian studies, descriptive and empirical research has only confirmed their own ultimate goal of constructing national specificity and a particularly antiquated view of national culture. In this article, I show how and why an articulate analysis of the main intellectual traditions and their impact can provide fresh insights into grasping the cultural particularism of Albanian studies. Methodologically, a new picture of knowledge production must arise if we consider the historical, cultural, political and ideological terrain on which certain influential ideas and practices in Albanian studies of people’s culture have emerged. The aim, then, is not to provide an exhaustive picture of a positive knowledge of culture and society, but to show the urgent need for avoiding any adoption of concepts that might be pure reconstructions of arbitrary and timeless structures and values, while rejecting any approach in terms of survivals and folklorism.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History
Reference114 articles.
1. Barth F. (1969) ‘Introduction’, in his Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 9–38.
2. Barthes R. (1957) Le mythe aujourd’hui [The Myth of Today]. Paris: Seuil.
3. Bausinger H. (1993) Volkskunde ou l’ethnologie allemande [German Folklore and Ethnology]. Paris: MSH.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献