Framing risk in clinical practice

Author:

Ortendahl Monica1

Affiliation:

1. Malma Backe 3 H, 75647 Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

In everyday clinical work, judgements and decisions are made which entail assessment of risk. Decisions are embedded in a context of other factors in which the psychological perspective or frame could shift. A summary of valuation factors for clinical risk is presented: (a) personal risks are specific to the patient, whereas the doctor has a general perception of risks; (b) personal risks are underestimated, with risks from adverse health behaviours judged as smaller than the same risks for people in general; (c) with a smaller difference in perceived risk between doctors and patients, it is easier to reach an agreement on treatment options; (d) expressing risk explicitly increases consensus about treatment; and (e) framing risk information as a gain rather than a loss increases consensus.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3