Nonadherence with Immunosuppressive Drugs: Us Compared with European Kidney Transplant Recipients

Author:

Denhaerynck Kris1,Desmyttere Ariane1,Dobbels Fabienne1,Moons Philip1,Young Jim1,Siegal Bonita1,Greenstein Stuart1,Steiger Jürg1,Vanrenterghem Yves1,Squifflet Jean-Paul1,van Hooff Johannes P.1,De Geest Sabina1

Affiliation:

1. University of Basel, Switzerland (KD, SDG), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (AD, FD, PM, SDG), Basel Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland (JY), Kontracted Health Associated Services, Carmel, NY (BS), Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY (SG), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (JS, SDG), University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium (YV), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium (J-PS), Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands (JPH)

Abstract

Background System factors increasingly are suggested as important yet understudied correlates of nonadherence. Objective To explore the relationship between healthcare system and prevalence of nonadherence with immunosuppressive regimen by studying variation in nonadherence between European and US kidney transplant recipients and as well as nonadherence in European countries. Methods We performed a secondary data analysis on data collected in 3 independent cross-sectional studies using comparable methodology including patients from the United States, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Switzerland. Nonadherence was measured using 1 item of the Siegal questionnaire. Patients were categorized as nonadherent if they reported missing a dose of immunosuppression in the last 4 weeks. Analyses were performed by multiple mixed logistic regression, with center as a random effect and clinical and demographical differences between groups as fixed effects. Results 1563 US and 614 European patients from 3 different countries (Belgium [n=187], the Netherlands [n=85], and Switzerland [n=342]) were included. Prevalence of nonadherence in the United States and Europe was 19.3% and 13.2.%, respectively. This higher nonadherence in US patients was confirmed in a multiple logistic regression analysis (OR=1.78; 95% CI, 1.10–2.89). Nonadherence differed between Belgium (16%) and the Netherlands (14.1%) (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.80) and between Belgium and Switzerland (11.4%; OR=0.17; 95% CI, 0.0–0.42). Conclusion This is the first study showing differences in prevalence of nonadherence between European and US patients and among European patients. Further research should aim at unraveling the dynamics explaining these differences.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Transplantation

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3