Deceased Organ Donor Management and Organ Distribution From Organ Procurement Organization-Based Recovery Facilities Versus Acute-Care Hospitals

Author:

Vail Emily A.123ORCID,Schaubel Douglas E.4,Potluri Vishnu S.256,Abt Peter L.567,Martin Niels D.8,Reese Peter P.256,Neuman Mark D.123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

3. Penn Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

4. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

6. Penn Transplant Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA

7. Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

8. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Introduction: Organ recovery facilities address the logistical challenges of hospital-based deceased organ donor management. While more organs are transplanted from donors in facilities, differences in donor management and donation processes are not fully characterized. Research Question: Does deceased donor management and organ transport distance differ between organ procurement organization (OPO)-based recovery facilities versus hospitals? Design: Retrospective analysis of Organ Procurement and Transplant Network data, including adults after brain death in 10 procurement regions (April 2017-June 2021). The primary outcomes were ischemic times of transplanted hearts, kidneys, livers, and lungs. Secondary outcomes included transport distances (between the facility or hospital and the transplant program) for each transplanted organ. Results: Among 5010 deceased donors, 51.7% underwent recovery in an OPO-based recovery facility. After adjustment for recipient and system factors, mean differences in ischemic times of any transplanted organ were not significantly different between donors in facilities and hospitals. Transplanted hearts recovered from donors in facilities were transported further than hearts from hospital donors (median 255 mi [IQR 27, 475] versus 174 [IQR 42, 365], P = .002); transport distances for livers and kidneys were significantly shorter ( P < .001 for both). Conclusion: Organ recovery procedures performed in OPO-based recovery facilities were not associated with differences in ischemic times in transplanted organs from organs recovered in hospitals, but differences in organ transport distances exist. Further work is needed to determine whether other observed differences in donor management and organ distribution meaningfully impact donation and transplantation outcomes.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Transplantation

Reference27 articles.

1. Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery

2. Organ donation after death in Ontario: a population-based cohort study

3. Vail EA, Vaugha n CJ, Reese PP, Neuman MD. Models of centralized deceased organ donor management in the United States [Abstract]. Academy Health Annual Research Meeting. Washington, DC. June 5, 2022. Abstract 52627. Accessed August 6, 2023. https://academyhealth.confex.com/academyhealth/2022arm/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/52627

4. Brockmeier D. OPO Center Experience. Presentation to the national academies of science, engineering, and medicine virtual workshop: a fairer and more equitable, cost-effective, and transparent system of donor organ procurement, allocation, and distribution. Accessed August 6, 2023. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/02-04-2021/docs/D9CC1FB8200374EDA12023AA50752CC5AEB625C27CA5?noSaveAs=1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3