Prioritizing Indigenous Peoples’ knowledge in federal decision-making: insights from faculty, graduate students, and tribal leaders

Author:

Lefthand-Begay Clarita1ORCID,Agajanian Taylor J1ORCID,Carbajalt Itza A1,La Torre Joanna C2ORCID,Littlesun Cheyne P3,McCarty Micah4,Rose Jessica M5,Ruhm Robin6,Sheban Caitie5,Yamane Cherry YEW7ORCID,Williams Michael8

Affiliation:

1. Information School, University of Washington, USA

2. School of Social Work, University of Washington, USA

3. School of Medicine, University of Washington, USA

4. Independent Indigenous Researcher and Cultural Advisor, Makah Indian Tribe, USA

5. School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, USA

6. College of Engineering, University of Washington, USA

7. School of Public Health, University of Washington, USA

8. Akiak Native Community, USA

Abstract

In response to the mounting global climate crisis, the Biden administration began developing guidelines for incorporating Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge into US federal decision-making. Though Indigenous Peoples are the original caretakers and stewards of the land, colonization, breached treaties, and false narratives have affected self-determination, treaty rights, and land management. This has negative consequences on the environment, and health of all our relations. When considering the sensitivity of knowledge, information, and data about sacred cultural systems, many Indigenous communities are wary of the high potential of misrepresentation, disrespectful handling, and cooptation. These concerns only deepen with conversations about opening public access to Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge because such policies would allow for the broad sharing of data and its ongoing re-use. We assert that Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge must be incorporated respectfully, knowledge integration must benefit all Indigenous communities, and all Indigenous communities must lead in the process of incorporating Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge into federal decision-making.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference66 articles.

1. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. (2018). Guide to working with non-federally recognized in the section 106 process. https://www.achp.gov/sites/default/files/whitepapers/2018-06/GuidetoWorkingwithNon-FederallyRecognizedTribesintheSection106Process.pdf

2. Yarning as protected space: relational accountability in research

3. The return to the sacred path: Healing the historical trauma and historical unresolved grief response among the lakota through a psychoeducational group intervention

4. Calling forth our pasts, citing our futures: an envisioning of a Kaupapa Māori citational practice

5. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3