Evaluation of Different Patterns of Zygomaticoorbital Complex Fractures

Abstract

Study Design Very few studies exist regarding the fracture pattern variability of the zygomaticoorbital (ZMO) complex. The retrospective evaluation of a large series of surgically treated unilateral ZMO fractures would in certain circumstances help intraoperative predictability and define sensitive indicators for open reduction and internal fixation. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the different fracture patterns after ZMO complex injury regarding the 5 anatomic sutures of the zygoma as well as the concomitance of the paranasal buttress and maxillary sinus wall fracture. Methods The medical records of all patients with unilateral ZMO fractures who underwent surgical intervention in a single trauma center department between April 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and anamnesis data, radiologic findings, and surgical reports were evaluated. According to the preoperative radiologic evaluation, ZMO fractures were classified as unisutural, bisutural, trisutural, tetrasutural, and complete based on the number of zygomatic sutures. The prevalence of various fracture patterns was analyzed. The impact of patient’s age and trauma etiology on the fracture pattern was evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis. Results The study included 492 patients with unilateral ZMO fractures, with a mean age of 49.93 years (SD = 20.66) and a male:female ratio of 2.23:1. The most affected age group was 19–44 years (41.67%) and tripping falls were the most common etiology (27.24%). Trisutural (57.32%) and unisutural fractures (23.17%) were the most common, followed by tetrasutural (8.94%), bisutural (8.54%), and complete fractures (2.03%). A trisutural fracture involving the zygomaticomaxillary suture, the infraorbital rim, and the zygomaticosphenoidal suture was the most common fracture pattern (52.03%). Most fractures were observed in the zygomaticosphenoidal suture (86.99%), followed by the infraorbital rim (74.59%) and the zygomaticomaxillary suture (68.29%). Fractures of the maxillary sinus wall and the paranasal buttress co-existed in 9.55% and 31.30% of all cases, respectively. No correlation was detected between age and fracture pattern ( P = .4111). Tripping falls and bicycle accidents significantly influenced the fracture pattern ( P < .0001). Conclusions According to the results, knowledge of the fracture pattern variability of the ZMO complex could in certain circumstances designate CT or CBCT as mandatory before operating on ZMO fractures. Consequently, unnecessary incisions could be avoided. The high concomitance of paranasal buttress fracture also suggests its intraoperative surgical exploration. Further studies should correlate the clinical findings with indication for surgery and postoperative outcome for the different fracture patterns described.