Comparison of Surgical Decompression and Steroid Therapy for the Management of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Pandey Sameer1ORCID,Reddy Gosla S.2,Chug Ashi3,Dixit Ashutosh4,Raja Balgovind S.5

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

2. GSR Institute of Craniofacial Surgery Saidabad, Hyderabad, India

3. Discipline of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

4. Faculty of Dentistry and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Science, Rishikesh, India

5. Faculty of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India

Abstract

Study Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective Treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) has been a subject of debate for many decades due to the scarcity of evidence-based treatment protocols. This review compares surgical decompression (SD) and steroid therapy (ST) as treatment approaches in TON patients. Methods A PRISMA-guided systematic review using PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Scopus databases was performed till the last search date of July 31st 2021. The outcome of interest was an improvement in visual acuity. A meta-analysis of the odds ratio was performed using a random-effect model and sub-group analysis based upon criteria for assessment of improvement in visual acuity. Results Sixteen studies (including 1046 patients) were included in the review. The review could identify 590 patients treated with SD and 456 treated with ST. In addition, there was a second cohort of patients presenting with NLP (no light perception). A meta-analysis with a sub-group analysis revealed that there was statistically no significant difference between the two treatment approaches in terms of improvement in VA. Conclusions There is no difference in treatment results of SD or ST for TON. Several treatment protocols and different criteria for assessing visual acuity led to difficulty in generating evidence for selecting the correct treatment approach.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3