Interfacility Transfers for Isolated Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Perspectives of the Facial Trauma Surgeon

Author:

Pontell Matthew1,Mount Delora2,Steinberg Jordan P.3,Mackay Donald4,Golinko Michael5,Drolet Brian C.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

2. Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI, USA

3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pediatric Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

4. Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA

5. Division of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Division of Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery, Monroe Carrell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, USA

6. Department of Plastic Surgery, Department of Medical Bioinformatics, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Study Design: Secondary overtriage is a burden to the medical system. Unnecessary transfers overload trauma centers, occupy emergency transfer resources, and delay definitive patient care. Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma, especially in isolation, is a frequent culprit. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the perspectives of facial trauma surgeons regarding the interfacility transfer of patients with isolated CMF trauma. Methods: A 31-item survey was developed using Likert-type scale and open-ended response systems. Internal consistency testing among facial trauma surgeons yielded a Cronbach’s α calculation of .75. The survey was distributed anonymously to the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, the North American Division of AO Craniomaxillofacial, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Statistical significance in response plurality was determined by nonoverlapping 99.9% confidence intervals ( P < .001). Sum totals were reported as means with standard deviations and z scores with P values of less than .05 considered significant. Results: The survey yielded 196 responses. Seventy-seven percent of respondents did not believe that most isolated CMF transfers required emergency surgery and roughly half (49%) thought that most emergency transfers were unnecessary. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed that most patients transferred could have been referred for outpatient management and 87% thought that transfer guidelines could help decrease unnecessary transfers. Twenty-seven percent of respondents had no pre-transfer communication with the referring facility. Perspectives on the transfer of specific fracture patterns and their presentations were also collected. Conclusion: Most facial trauma surgeons in this study believe that emergent transfer for isolated CMF trauma is frequently unnecessary. Such injuries rarely require emergent surgery and can frequently be managed in the outpatient setting without activating emergency transfer services. The fracture-specific data collected are a representation of the national, multidisciplinary opinion of facial trauma surgeons and correlate with previously published data on which specific types of facial fractures are most often transferred unnecessarily. The results of this study can serve as the foundation for interfacility transfer guidelines, which may provide a valuable resource in triaging transfers and decreasing associated health-care costs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery,Surgery

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Facial Trauma Transfers: Taking the Lead;Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery;2024-01

2. Your face is worth it;The American Journal of Surgery;2023-09

3. Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Midface Fractures in the United States;Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery;2023-02

4. Isolated facial fractures transferred for higher level of care;The American Journal of Surgery;2023-01

5. Pediatric Craniomaxillofacial Trauma;Pediatrics In Review;2022-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3