Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures and a Review of External Fixation Techniques

Author:

Cohn Jason E.1,Othman Sammy2,Bosco Samuel3,Shokri Tom4,Evarts Marissa1,Papajohn Paul1,Zwillenberg Seth5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

3. Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Introduction: Fractures of the zygomatic bone can present with complicated aesthetic and neurological pathology. Specifically, management of isolated zygomatic fracture has been sparsely discussed in the literature, and most studies are based upon older techniques. Here, we compare the results of 2 critical operative techniques as well as review the available literature in the setting of isolated zygomatic fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution from 2010 to 2018 examining for patients who had sustained an isolated zygomatic fracture confirmed by computed tomography scan. Patients were excluded if they sustained additional maxillofacial fractures. Demographical information, symptoms on presentation, fracture management modality, and postoperative course were all collected and examined. Results: A total of 218 patients were identified for inclusion. The average age of this cohort was 45.5 ± 18 years, with 77.5% being male. Assault (55%) was most the frequent cause of injury with accidents being the least common (17.9%). Most patients (78.8%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients who underwent operation more often presented with zygomatic deformity (97.7% vs 18.4%), paresthesia (29.5% vs 2.9%), and trismus (29.5% vs 6.9%) when compared to their nonoperatively managed counterparts. In all, 44 operatively managed patients underwent open reduction with or without eternal fixation (Gillies Approach vs Keen Approach). There were no significant differences in the presence of zygomatic deformity, paresthesia, and trismus between the 2 operative techniques. Conclusions: Isolated zygomatic arch fractures can present with discerning symptoms. Unfortunately, the literature on appropriate management is not well described. We find external fixation to provide reestablishment of both form and function with minimal required exposure, although the outcomes may be similar without the use of external fixation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery,Surgery

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Retrospective Study over 15-years Period on Zygomathic arch Fractures: A Single Center Experience;Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery;2024-08-17

2. Is Gillies Temporal Incision Necessary to Successfully Reduce Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture Combined With Orbital Wall Fracture?;Journal of Craniofacial Surgery;2024-02-26

3. A Novel Method in Restoring Form and Function Following Malunited Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures- A Technical Note;International Journal of Orofacial Research;2024-01-27

4. The Forehead and Brow;Anatomy of the Forehead, Face, and Neck;2024

5. Fratture del piano medio del massiccio facciale;EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche - Chirurgia ORL e Cervico-Facciale;2022-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3