Confidence Judgments on Color Category Best Exemplars

Author:

Alvarado Nancy1,Jameson Kimberly A.2

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Diego,

2. University of California, Irvine University of California, San Diego

Abstract

Although basic color terms and basic color appearances have been shown to produce higher confidence ratings in a variety of naming and judgment tasks, our findings suggest that when different ethnolinguistic cultures are compared, higher confidence is not strictly linked to the basic foci of Berlin and Kay nor the centroid samples identified by Boynton and colleagues. This raises important questions about high confidence as evidence of the salience of basic color foci, a point central to the widely accepted basic color-term theoretical framework. This study analyzes confidence judgment data for Vietnamese and English color naming, suggesting that high confidence may be more directly linked to aspects of a task rather than universal focal color stimuli. Culture-specific patterns of naming, an individual’s access to shared cultural knowledge, and goodness of fit between exemplars and names provide a more complete explanation of the higher confidence observed for certain color appearances.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mesoamerican Color Survey Digital Archive;Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology;2023

2. Quantitative approach for defining basic color terms and color category best exemplars;Journal of the Optical Society of America A;2017-07-05

3. Mesoamerican Color Survey Digital Archive;Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology;2016

4. Mesoamerican Color Survey Digital Archive;Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology;2015

5. Shared Knowledge About Emotion Among Vietnamese and English Bilingual and Monolingual Speakers;Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology;2011-07-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3