Development of the My Medicines and Me (M3Q) side effect questionnaire for mental health patients: a qualitative study

Author:

Ashoorian Deena M.1,Davidson Rowan M.2,Rock Daniel J. T.3,Seubert Liza J.4,Clifford Rhonda M.4

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacy Program, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, M315, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

2. North Metropolitan Health Service Mental Health, Perth, Australia; (School of Medicine and Pharmacology) The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

3. North Metropolitan Health Service Mental Health, Perth, Australia; (School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences) (School of Population Health) The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

4. Pharmacy Program (School of Medicine and Pharmacology,) The University of Western Australia, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, content validity and usability of the My Medicines and Me (M3Q) self-report side effect questionnaire. Methods: Eight focus groups consisting of mental health patients, carers, general practitioners, psychiatrists, mental health nurses and pharmacists were conducted, involving 78 participants. Two researchers independently examined the transcriptions and analysed the data thematically using an inductive method. Results: The findings supported changes to the formatting, length and phrasing of questions in the original version of the questionnaire. Although the groups provided differing views on the usability of the M3Q in clinical practice, the patient and carer groups were unconditionally in favour of such a tool to be used systematically to describe patients’ subjective experiences with side effects. Conclusion: The differing contribution made by all groups involved in the administration and completion of the M3Q assisted with content validity of the questionnaire. The acceptability and usability of this novel side effect questionnaire was also explored, with many participants agreeing it was a necessary tool for a patient centred approach to treatment. Following implementation of the changes to the current format of the questionnaire, investigation into the uptake and use in clinical practice should be carried out.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous),Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Factors that influence patient and public adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework;International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy;2023-05-29

2. Experimental Approaches and Generating the Evidence;Encyclopedia of Evidence in Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy;2023

3. Experimental Approaches and Generating the Evidence;Encyclopedia of Evidence in Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy;2023

4. Patient-Reported Questionnaires to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2021-11-12

5. A clinical communication tool for the assessment of psychotropic medication side effects;Psychiatry Research;2015-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3