Truer Facts Through Stronger Values: Confronting Science's Sociopolitical Realities

Author:

Eisenberg-Guyot Nadja12,Eisenberg-Guyot Jerzy3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

2. Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA

3. Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Assaults on science have led scientists to demand “politics-free/values-free” science that safeguards science against error by grounding it in “politically neutral” evidence. Considering racial disparities in lead poisoning, HIV/AIDS, and COVID-19, we show the solution is doomed. Politically charged beliefs are essential for assessing public-health research; thus, the beliefs’ truth affects the research's accuracy. However, science's sociopolitical uses systematically distort politically charged beliefs. Since errors assimilate into our scientific corpus and inform new hypotheses, scientists need accurate sociopolitical theories of distorting forces to identify errors. Analyzing Black-Panther opposition to violence research, we argue since racial disparities structure society and science has been distorted to buttress racial inequities, knowledgeable anti-racist scientists exert corrective forces on research. They hold accurate politically charged beliefs about sociopolitical forces shaping science and health, and are committed to eradicating distortions. Thus, rather than quarantining politically charged beliefs, scientists should sharpen their sociopolitical theories and normative commitments.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference99 articles.

1. Feldman J, Cartus A, Prins SJ. Biden’s coronavirus plan will not prevent death and devastation. The Nation, 2021, https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/covid-shutdown-biden/ (accessed 1 November 2021).

2. Feldman J. Coronavirus is an occupational disease that spreads at work. Jacobin, 2021, https://jacobinmag.com/2021/01/covid-19-business-work-public-health (accessed 1 November 2021).

3. Jackson D. Herding people to slaughter: the dangerous fringe theory behind the Great Barrington Declaration and push toward herd immunity. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2020, https://blog.ucsusa.org/derrick-jackson/herding-people-to-slaughter-the-dangerous-fringe-theory-behind-the-great-barrington-declaration-and-push-toward-herd-immunity (accessed 1 November 2021).

4. American Public Health Association. Public health organizations condemn herd immunity scheme for controlling spread of SARS-CoV-2, 2020, https://www.apha.org/News-and-Media/News-Releases/APHA-News-Releases/2020/Public-Health-Orgs-condemn-SARS-CoVid2-plan (accessed 1 November 2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3