Affiliation:
1. Palliative care, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2. Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
One of the common domains in health care in which the concept of vulnerability is used is end-of-life care, including euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS). Since different uses and implications of the notion have been recognised in the literature on EAS, this paper aims to analyse them and reflect on who is the most vulnerable in the context of EAS. A prior exploratory review of the literature has served as a starting point for the discussion. We concluded that vulnerability is a complex, multi-perspective and multi-layered concept, which implies the vulnerability of different stakeholders involved in EAS practices and vulnerability in different aspects of being human (i.e., physical, mental, moral, social and spiritual). A comprehensive understanding of the notion of vulnerability, which balances as well as complements the concept of autonomy, seems to be an indispensable element of the discourse on EAS.
Subject
Philosophy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference78 articles.
1. The Belmont Report, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html (1979).
2. Respect for Human Vulnerability: The Emergence of a New Principle in Bioethics
3. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (2005).