Abstract
Parsons’ sick role concept has become problematic in the face of the increased significance of chronic illnesses and the growing emphasis on lifestylecentred health promotion. Both developments de-limit the medical system so that it extends into the world of health, fundamentally changing the doctor-patient relationship. But as the sick role is firmly based on the reciprocities of a resiliently capitalist achievement society it still informs normative expectations in the field of health and illness. The precarious social position of chronic patients between being governed by and being consumers of medicine, I will argue, can only be adequately understood if one involves, as Parsons did, the moral economy surrounding health and illness.
Subject
Cultural Studies,Health(social science),Social Psychology
Reference77 articles.
1. The Sick-Role Concept
2. Barbier, J.C. and B. Théret ( 2001) ‘Welfare-to-work or Work-to-welfare: The French Case’, pp. 135-83 in N. Gilbert and R. van Voorhis (eds) Activating the Unemployed: A Comparative Appraisal of Work-oriented Policies. Edison, NJ: Transaction.
3. Behrens, J. ( 1997) ‘Krankheit/Armut: Individualisierung sichernde Lebenslaufpolitiken’ , pp. 1054-74 in S. Hradil (ed.) Differenz und Integration . Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
4. Behrens, J. and A. Dreyer-Tümmel ( 1996) ‘Abstiegskarrieren und Auffangpositio nen’ , pp. 1188-226 in J. Behrens and W. Voges (eds) Kritische Übergänge. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
5. Blane, D. ( 1987) ‘The Value of Labour-power and Health’, pp. 8-36 in G. Scambler (ed.) Sociological Theory and Medical Sociology. London: Tavistock .
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献