Glandular Crowdings in Endometrial Polyps: Clinical Follow-Up and Possible Worrisome Features

Abstract

Introduction Interpretation of changes and premalignant lesions in endometrial polyps can be challenging. We evaluated the clinical course of patients with focal gland crowdings in endometrial polyps via repeat biopsies and searched for possible morphological findings in the initial biopsy that may foresee a premalignant course. Methods Specimens diagnosed as endometrial polyp and focal gland crowding in patients who had a repeat biopsy in a 1-year period were reexamined. Morphological findings in the initial biopsies were recorded. The group whose repeat biopsies were “premalignant or malignant” (Group 1), and the group with “benign” repeat biopsies (Group 2) were compared. Results “Endometrial polyp and gland crowdings” was diagnosed in 115 specimens of which 38 patients had repeat biopsies. Among these 8 (21%) were diagnosed as “endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN)” (Group 1) and 30 (79%) as “benign” (Group 2). Morphological features in the initial biopsies were evaluated; PAX2 loss was 6 of 8 (75%) for Group 1 and 7 of 30 (23%) for Group 2 ( P = .020), and altered epithelial cytological features were present in 5 of 8 (62%) versus 4 of 30 (13%) ( P = .015), both significantly higher in Group 1. Dark intraluminal secretion, intraluminal histiocytes, intraglandular epithelial proliferation, and mean diameter of crowded gland areas were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusion “Focal gland crowdings” in endometrial polyps do carry a risk of EIN in subsequent biopsies. We suggest that the loss/decrease of PAX2 and altered epithelial cytological features in these areas in the initial biopsy are indicative of a premalignant course.