Reporting Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Carcinomas: Which Method has the Highest Prognostic Power and What Should be the Optimal Cut-off Value?

Author:

Öztürk Çiğdem1ORCID,Okcu Oğuzhan2,Öztürk Seda Duman3ORCID,Şen Bayram4,Öztürk Ahmet Emin5,Bedir Recep2

Affiliation:

1. Pathology Department, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Training and Research Hospital, Rize, Türkiye

2. Pathology Department, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Medicine, Rize, Türkiye

3. Pathology Department, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Izmit, Türkiye

4. Biochemistry Department, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Training and Research Hospital, Rize, Türkiye

5. Medical Oncology Department, Health Sciences University, Prof Dr Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

. Hormone receptor (HR) expression is a critical marker that plays a role in the treatment and management of breast cancer. Even if patients receive hormone treatment with a hormone positivity rate of over 1%, it is controversial at what level of positivity they benefit from treatment and contribute positively to their prognosis. . We retrospectively examined the estrogen receptor (ER) / progesterone receptor (PR) expression status, clinicopathological findings, and survival data of 386 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer. ER/PR expressions of the patients were evaluated according to Allred, H-score and were also grouped according to staining percentages. Separate cut-off values were determined for each of these evaluation methods, and the prognostic power of these methods was investigated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. . The prognostic power of all methods was found to be similar in terms of predicting survival. According to the staining percentage of the patients, survival was excellent if the ER value was >80% and the PR value was >1%. . All recommended methods for reporting HRs have similar prognostic power. However, in patients with high percentage staining for ER using these methods, the prognosis is excellent. As a result, we predict that if the percentage of ER staining is low, changing the treatment management of patients may be considered clinically.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference33 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3