Affiliation:
1. School of Marxism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Neoclassical economics relies on highly formalized deductive logic to create an overly simplified picture of economic practices. Its universalized model of modernization assumes that the relationship between state and market is antagonistic. This presumption reduces China’s “economic miracle” to a simple transformation into a market economy and underestimates the role played by the government, making it impossible to construct a theory that considers China’s subjectivity. Studies on China’s economy should focus on its practices, which may appear to be paradoxical if seen only from the perspective of Western neoclassical economics, in order to construct an accurate depiction of the foundations of China’s development experience. Only through such an endeavor will it be possible to incorporate into any new theory of economic modernization the distinctive features of China’s development.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference41 articles.
1. COASE RONALD H. (1990) The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
2. FUKUYAMA FRANCIS (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献