Affiliation:
1. University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
The Maoist regime has conventionally been understood as a totalitarian apparatus hostile to the individual. Yet the mass dictatorship also saw the proliferation of guidebooks on how to write a diary. This article is a pioneering exploration of these didactic texts, situating them within a longer Chinese tradition of popular subjectivation. A close reading of the guidebooks in light of their Republican predecessors suggests that the regime simultaneously anticipated the individual’s role as revolutionary agent of change and viewed it with trepidation. Prescribing paradigmatic frameworks for constructing socialist subjectivities, the manuals propagated journal-keeping as a political routine by which to shape the writer’s life and selfhood. Central in these teachings was the desire to mobilize yet monopolize the individual’s conscious agency. At once empowering and constraining, the “how-to” books rendered creative self-reflexivity indispensable—albeit dangerous—to the Maoist agenda, revealing a deep-seated anxiety of the state about socialism’s modern legacies.
Funder
Esherick-Ye Family Foundation
China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
Norman MacGeorge Scholarship
university of melbourne
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference85 articles.
1. Apter David E., Saich Tony (1994) Revolutionary Discourse in Mao’s Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
2. Lost Time: Temporal Discipline And Historical Awareness In Nineteenth-Century Dutch Egodocuments
3. Botonaki Effie (2004) Seventeenth-Century English Women’s Autobiographical Writings: Disclosing Enclosures. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
4. Maoism at the Grassroots
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献