Affiliation:
1. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2. Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Abstract
State-owned “enterprises” from the planned era, converted into profit-making state firms in the 2000s, have been playing a major role in the continued spectacular growth of China’s GDP. This fact, however, has been obscured by hegemonic neoliberal economic discourse with its assumption that only private firms can drive economic development, thereby turning what is a major dynamic into a major failing. At the same time, by a variety of abstract constructs founded on theoretical speculations rather than empirical reality, neoliberal economic and sociological discourse has also obscured the mounting social inequalities that have accompanied Chinese development. The evidence shows that central and local Chinese government actions lie at the root of the growing social inequalities. This article ends with a discussion of the new Chongqing experiment and its implications for the big issue of the direction of China’s future development: whether “state capitalism” or “socialist market economy,” not in rhetoric but in actual substance.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference25 articles.
1. The Return to Capital in China
2. A Chinese State Enterprise under the Reforms: What Model of Capitalism?
3. China Development Research Foundation (2005) China Human Development Report. United Nations Development Programme, China Country Office.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献