The influence of nasal deviation on the perception of maxillary dental centreline and smile aesthetics

Author:

Grimes Karl1,Fleming Padhraig S1ORCID,Sharma Pratik K1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Oral Bioengineering, Institute of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London, UK

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of nasal deviation on the perception of the maxillary dental centreline position as judged by orthodontists, dentists and laypersons. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK. Participants: Three groups of raters comprising 30 orthodontists, 30 dentists and 30 laypersons. Methods: A frontal photograph of a smiling white woman was captured and digitally manipulated with varying degrees of nasal deviation and dental centreline (DC) position in increments of 1.5 mm and 3 mm to the right and left. Three rater groups assessed the attractiveness of images using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Multiple regression analysis was undertaken, and images were compared using the Tukey HSD method. Results: Using a mixed linear model, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated in the range of 69%–86%, indicating good inter-rater reliability. The interaction between image rating and nasal position ( P < 0.001), DC position ( P < 0.001) and the relationship between nose and DC position ( P < 0.001) were found to be statistically significant with symmetrical upper midline and nasal tip position, both considered to be most aesthetically pleasing. Image rating was not influenced by rater group type ( P = 0.995), age ( P = 0.983) or sex ( P = 0.476). Conclusion: There was a preference for a central and coincident nose and maxillary DC position uniformly across the rater groups. Deviations of the nose, DC and their interactions negatively impacted on perceived smile aesthetics with increasing extent and opposing direction of deviations rated progressively more unaesthetic. No differences were observed between orthodontists, general dental practitioners and lay people with respect to perceived impact on smile aesthetics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthodontics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3