Affiliation:
1. University of Memphis.
2. Department of Administration and Supervision at the University of Kentucky and codirector of the UCEA Center for the Study of the Superintendency.
Abstract
Media reports of a crisis in the American superintendency, based on anecdotal reports and scattered superintendent opinions about a growing number of retirements, high turnover, and an inadequate pool of qualified applicants, are contributing to widespread public misperceptions. The Education Commission of the States (ECS) recently completed a nationwide survey of school board presidents, those with direct knowledge of the number and quality of candidates in superintendent search pools, to better understand the nature and scope of this issue. Findings indicate that a nationwide crisis in the superintendency does not exist. Rather, the number and quality of applicants appears adequate. Data also suggest, however, that some districts have a history of “churning” superintendents. These circumstances contribute disproportionately to these districts having high turnover rates and a relatively smaller number of qualified applicants in search pools. We suggest that the crisis has been misdiagnosed. It is not one associated with the superintendency per se but involves political conflict among local school board members.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献