Abstract
How does a community remain committed to an imagined digital future despite that future’s inherent contradictions? This article analyzes such a challenge as it was faced by Berlin’s NFT (non-fungible token) enthusiasts. Dominant narratives about NFTs and other blockchain technologies envision a virtual and ostensibly trust-free future, but these enthusiasts’ pursuit of such “trustless technologies” resulted in a double bind. In this bind, they repudiated trust relations on the web without the means to fully obviate such relations, leaving blockchain’s trustless future in doubt. To resolve this bind, Berlin’s NFT enthusiasts expanded their interactions by assembling in-person. In Berlin’s offline spaces, they found trust relations they deemed permissible according to the dominant blockchain ideology. Rather than blur the boundary between the virtual and physical, this community maintained distinct interactional norms in each, enabling them to maintain their imagined blockchain future.
Funder
Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies
Reference54 articles.
1. @Artnome (2021) Noteworthy that the important projects, fueled by die-hard community support, almost always kick off and grow in the troughs. Available at: https://twitter.com/artnome/status/1401895390602051584 (accessed 25 December 2022).
2. @Oyacaro (2022a) A short □ on @NFTClubBerlin. Available at: https://twitter.com/oyacaro/status/1507674705410539523 (accessed 24 December 2022).
3. Ghana’s blockchain scene on WhatsApp
4. NFTs and asset class spillovers: Lessons from the period around the COVID-19 pandemic