Affiliation:
1. University of Vienna, Austria
2. University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy
Abstract
In this study, we examine connective protest mobilization and suppression during the 2021 protests in Russia. We use time series analysis to study the dynamic interplay between the pro-Navalny movement and pro-government countermovement on Twitter, complemented by network analyses of co-retweeting networks to assess the movements’ coordination patterns. Findings show that pro-Navalny accounts were more active and coordinated within more centralized Twitter networks than pro-government accounts. Contrarily, the pro-government camp employed preventive communication tactics and coordinated in more clustered networks. Granger causality tests reveal that pro-Navalny tweeting activity triggered increased pro-regime reaction during the largest protests on 23 January and 21 April, whereas pro-government tweeting activity caused the escalation of pro-Navalny reaction during the 14 February protests. Both sides’ tweeting activity decreased after the February protests, presumably due to external repression. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of online mobilization and coordination strategies via social media in authoritarian contexts.
Reference62 articles.
1. Auguié B, Antonov A (2017) GridExtra: miscellaneous functions for “grid” graphics (software). Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gridExtra
2. Baklanov A (2021) Incoming, trolls Thousands of suspicious accounts target Russian opposition figures linked to Alexey Navalny on Instagram. Meduza, 20 January. Available at: https://meduza.io/en/feature/2021/01/20/incoming-trolls (accessed 19 May 2021).
3. The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests
4. academictwitteR: an R package to access the Twitter Academic Research Product Track v2 API endpoint
5. Tents, Tweets, and Events: The Interplay Between Ongoing Protests and Social Media